This would bring it in line with the overwhelming evidence showing that starting school later is best, and the practice in many countries, such as Sweden and Finland. These countries have better academic achievement and child well-being, despite children not starting school until age 7.
The fear is that the English system – which was introduced in 1870 in order to get women back into work, rather than on the basis of any educational benefit to children – is now causing profound damage. A similar story applies in the rest of the UK, and there is pressure for greater formality in preschools in other countries, such as the US."
I too with my children have noticed a big difference in maturity and behaviour when the child turns 7yrs old. It's almost like before that point there is a gradual change, but suddenly in the year they turn 7yrs old there is a significant step-like change.
What our education system in the UK doesn't seem to realise is that more is not always better, sometimes less is more.
full article from New Scientist here.
"In New Zealand, several key investigations compared children who started formal literacy lessons at age 5 with those who started age 7. They showed that early formal learning doesn’t improve reading development, and may even be damaging. By the age of 11, there was no difference in reading ability level between the two groups. However, those who started aged 5 developed less positive attitudes to reading and showed poorer text comprehension than those who had started later."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting!